When a Technique Gets Blocked: Learning to Adapt

Learning a martial arts or self-defense technique is relatively straightforward. A teacher shows you what to do, you practice the movement, and eventually you can make it work.

But what happens when the other person doesn't react the way you expected?

They may resist more strongly, block what you are doing, move differently, or counterattack. A technique that worked perfectly a moment ago can suddenly stop working.

This is where simply knowing more techniques is not necessarily enough. You also need to learn how to adjust when the situation changes.

Bruce Lee famously used the image of water to describe adaptability: rather than becoming fixed in one shape, change according to what you encounter. It is a powerful idea, but it also raises a practical question:

How do you actually train someone to become adaptable?

In Functional Wing Chun, one way we train this is by first allowing a technique to work, then deliberately adding resistance or a counter and asking the student to find a way to continue.

The basic progression looks like this:

WORKS → BLOCKED / COUNTERED → ADAPT → WORKS → CONTINUE → FINISH

Adaptation, however, is not the goal of the exercise. We are not trying to become endlessly creative or demonstrate how many different solutions we know. If fighting has become unavoidable, the overall objective remains much simpler:

Finish the fight as quickly as possible.

Adaptability is one of the things that helps us do that. When the opponent stops the route we originally chose, we need to be able to adjust without unnecessarily giving up the initiative and starting again.

First, we need a direction

Perhaps the student begins with a Pak Sao and punch. The teacher demonstrates it, the student learns the basic movement, and against the initial response it works. That gives us a starting point—a direction toward the objective.

Adaptability does not mean standing in front of someone waiting for random things to happen and then trying to react to each one. We initiate first. The opponent then gives us something real to adapt to.

The technique provides the first route.

What happens when the opponent tries to close that route is where the next part of the training begins.

Then the opponent resists

Once the first version works, the training partner changes what they are doing. Maybe they block the punch, change the position of the arm, counterattack, or simply find a way to stop our progress. Something that worked a moment ago now fails, or at least no longer works in exactly the same way.

One possible response is to add more strength and try to force the original movement through. Sometimes that may even work, but it teaches us very little about adaptation. The opponent's resistance has changed the situation, and importantly, that resistance often creates contact. The contact gives us information.

Through that contact, we can begin to feel where our progress is being stopped, where the resistance is coming from, and sometimes where the opponent has created a new opening by trying to close another one. Instead of blindly insisting that the original technique must still work, we can use that information to change what we are doing.

Adapt to the resistance

The adjustment does not always need to be large. Perhaps the hand changes direction, our position shifts slightly, another hand becomes available, or the opponent's attempt to stop us exposes a different route forward. The exact solution is less important than learning the process of recognizing what has changed and responding to it without losing sight of the objective.

This is why adaptability is different from simply collecting more techniques. We are not trying to memorize one predetermined answer for every possible counter. We are learning to recognize resistance, understand what it is doing to our progress, and find a way around it.

The objective remains. The resistance changes. So the route changes.

Adaptability is not the destination. It is a means of continuing when the route we initially chose is no longer available.

When it works, continue

This is why the next part of the sequence is so important: CONTINUE. If our adaptation succeeds, we do not automatically stop and reset simply because another movement worked. The fight may not be over, and the overall objective has not necessarily been achieved.

This connects directly to one of the ideas we use throughout Functional Wing Chun: Identify. Clear. Continue. Identify what is stopping your progress, clear it, and then continue toward the objective. If the opponent changes again, we adapt again. We act, they resist, the contact gives us information, we change what we are doing, and we continue.

The route may change several times in only a few moments. The objective does not.

And ultimately, finish

There is a danger when we talk too much about flow, adaptability and continuous movement. It can begin to sound as though continuing indefinitely is somehow the goal. It isn't. If fighting is unavoidable, we want it to end as quickly as possible.

So the full idea is not simply adapt and continue. It is adapt so that you can continue toward the finish. Becoming more adaptable makes us harder to stop, and becoming harder to stop matters because every unnecessary reset gives the opponent more time and another opportunity to attack, recover or change the situation.

The purpose of adaptability is therefore very practical: become harder to stop so that you can finish the fight as quickly as possible.

Adaptability during contact

There are many ways to be adaptable in martial arts. You can change strategy before engagement, adjust distance or timing, choose a different attack, change position, or decide that engagement should be avoided altogether. All of these forms of adaptability are important.

Functional Wing Chun also places considerable emphasis on something else: adapting after contact has already been established. We initiate, the opponent resists, and that resistance creates contact. The contact gives us information, and we use that information to adjust what we are doing while trying to preserve the initiative and continue toward the objective.

This is one reason contact training such as Chi Sao plays such an important role in Wing Chun. Contact is not something we maintain simply for the sake of staying connected. It allows us to feel change. It tells us when the route is no longer clear, and it gives us information that can help us find another one.

The goal stays. The route changes.

Perhaps this is where the image of being “like water” becomes particularly useful. Water does not insist on travelling through an obstacle exactly as it originally approached it. It changes according to what it encounters, but that does not mean becoming directionless.

Functional Wing Chun works in much the same way. The goal stays. The route changes. We initiate toward an objective, encounter resistance, use the contact to gather information, adapt, continue, and, when possible, finish.

WORKS → BLOCKED / COUNTERED → ADAPT → WORKS → CONTINUE → FINISH

A technique is where the exercise begins. Learning how to keep going when the opponent tries to stop it is where adaptability begins.

When a Drill Stops Solving the Problem

Every training drill should have a purpose.

Not simply to look good.

Not to preserve tradition.

Not because it has always been done that way.

A drill exists to develop a specific ability that supports the overall objective of the system.

This raises an important question.

What is the purpose of Chi Sao?

FWC defines Chi Sao as the systematic study of continuing progress after contact has been established.

Once we understand that objective, every Chi Sao drill can be evaluated using the same standard:

Does this drill improve the ability to continue progressing against a resisting opponent after contact has been established?

If the answer is yes, it deserves a place in training.

If the answer is no, we should ask what it is actually developing.

When Patterns Replace Problems

Many modern Chi Sao systems rely heavily on fixed sequences and predetermined patterns.

These patterns undoubtedly develop certain abilities. They improve coordination, familiarity with movement, timing with a cooperative partner, and the ability to remember increasingly complex combinations.

However, they also change the nature of the drill.

The moment the sequence becomes known, uncertainty begins to disappear.

Instead of identifying obstacles, the student remembers what comes next.

Instead of asking questions through contact, the student waits for the expected answer.

Instead of adapting, the student recalls.

Gradually, memory replaces decision-making.

The original problem that Chi Sao was meant to solve begins to disappear.

Does It Still Work Under Resistance?

There is a simple question worth asking.

What happens when the partner stops cooperating?

Not by becoming aggressive or competitive, but simply by refusing to follow the pattern.

In my own experience, this is where many fixed Chi Sao sequences begin to fall apart.

The practitioner often has to abandon the memorized pattern and start solving the problem in real time.

Ironically, this is exactly the skill the pattern was supposed to develop.

The drill has prepared the student to remember a sequence, but not necessarily to adapt when the sequence no longer exists.

Flow Is Not the Same as Function

One reason these patterns remain enjoyable is that they create a wonderful feeling of flow.

Two experienced partners can perform long, smooth exchanges with excellent rhythm and coordination.

The experience is satisfying.

But it is important to ask what is creating that feeling.

The flow comes largely from shared expectation.

Each partner already knows what is coming next.

In that sense, the exchange becomes more like a rehearsed routine than a conversation with an unpredictable opponent.

There is nothing wrong with practicing coordination.

The mistake is believing that coordination alone develops the ability to deal with resistance.

The Purpose of FWC Chi Sao

FWC takes a different approach.

Rather than memorizing increasingly complicated answers, we try to preserve the original problem.

The student should still have to:

• identify what is preventing progress,
• make tactical decisions,
• adapt to changing pressure,
• continue moving forward,
• and solve the problem without knowing exactly what will happen next.

Complexity is reduced when necessary, but the problem itself is never removed.

This is why FWC uses progressive resistance instead of progressive choreography.

The objective is not to remember more.

The objective is to become better at solving problems.

Training Parts of the Whole

Every drill in FWC has a specific job.

Lap Sao introduces the objective of identifying, clearing, and continuing.

Dan Chi Sao simplifies coordination when necessary without changing that objective.

Rolling Chi Sao develops continuous information gathering and adaptation.

Lat Sao bridges Chi Sao to striking under pressure.

The wooden dummy becomes a laboratory where problems discovered through Chi Sao can be explored and refined before being tested again against resistance.

Each drill trains part of the same engagement.

None of them replace the engagement itself.

Memory or Experience?

Experience cannot be memorized.

It must be earned.

Every time a student encounters resistance, identifies an obstacle, experiments with a solution, and succeeds or fails, they gain experience that no fixed sequence can provide.

This is why FWC places progressive resistance at the centre of training.

Not because resistance makes training harder.

Because resistance preserves the very problem Chi Sao was created to solve.

Conclusion

Chi Sao was never meant to become an exercise in remembering increasingly complicated patterns.

Its purpose is far more practical.

It exists to develop the ability to continue progressing after contact has been established.

Whenever a training method replaces tactical decision-making with memorization, it risks losing the very quality that made Chi Sao valuable in the first place.

For FWC, the question is always the same:

Does this drill preserve the real problem?

If it does, it deserves our time.

If it does not, then no matter how elegant, complicated, or traditional it appears, it is training something other than the ability to solve a resisting opponent.